There does need to be a mark. The question is how that legal status arises. Always by evidence. Some evidence is better than others. That’s why registration is always recommended because it shifts the burden. It also makes other damages attainable. Baring that, one has to prove their case with a registration. Use in commerce is the way to do that. A lot more to it, but those are the basics.
Set the intrinsics of Scrum aside for a moment. What makes believe in the lie? That’s the interesting question..;-)
An analogy, not a metaphor. Most “Wasabi” is fake. Given the outward facing parts of Scrum were co-opted from Professors Takeuchi and Nonaka by 1995.. anything labeled “Scrum” since then is indeed fake. As a matter of basic copyright and trademark law, no doubt about it.
A great metaphor, Maarten!
To shed some light on the most expensive vegetable, watch https://youtu.be/MS3WOUytP5w .
There does need to be a mark. The question is how that legal status arises. Always by evidence. Some evidence is better than others. That’s why registration is always recommended because it shifts the burden. It also makes other damages attainable. Baring that, one has to prove their case with a registration. Use in commerce is the way to do that. A lot more to it, but those are the basics.
Set the intrinsics of Scrum aside for a moment. What makes believe in the lie? That’s the interesting question..;-)
An analogy, not a metaphor. Most “Wasabi” is fake. Given the outward facing parts of Scrum were co-opted from Professors Takeuchi and Nonaka by 1995.. anything labeled “Scrum” since then is indeed fake. As a matter of basic copyright and trademark law, no doubt about it.