Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dean Peters's avatar

This hits. You don’t win arguments in product ... you win *experiments*.

Convincing fragile egos is a waste of cycles. Let the data do the talking. If someone won’t even try a reversible test, they’re not protecting the product ... they’re protecting their comfort.

Shift from persuasion to proof. And keep the door open on your way out.

Expand full comment
Alexis Kirienko's avatar

Hi Maarten!

Thank you for sharing your insights; I find them very valuable.

I mostly agree with your article and often use a similar approach in my work.

Sometimes, it's better to be flexible and try new things rather than sticking to what we think shouldn't be done.

You mentioned:

>"If the problem is that you’re not allowed to run experiments, even for easily reversible changes, then something is clearly rotten in your company."

But what should we do when there's a debate about how something affects people, and running an experiment could harm their experience?

For example, if we're discussing whether regular overtime leads to burnout, I wouldn't want to conduct an experiment that proves a point but demotivates the team.

It feels like a hollow victory.

This leads me to my second question: Is there a way to share our experiences with others, or are we just doomed to repeat the same mistakes?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts